Clematis

Submitted by Reed on Sat, 04/09/2011 - 23:14

Clematis alpina "stolwijk gold" flowering away. This is one of my favorite Clematis (well besides all the others bell shaped ones that I like :))

Comments


Submitted by Hoy on Sat, 04/09/2011 - 23:35

James, a very handsome plant!
Alpinas are among my favorite Clematises too. However, I still have to wait some weeks till they flower.


Submitted by ncole on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 05:34

That is absolutely gorgeous.  Could I grow this in humid zone 7?  (and how much sun does it need)?


Submitted by Mark McD on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 08:22

ncole wrote:

That is absolutely gorgeous.  Could I grow this in humid zone 7?  (and how much sun does it need)?

I was wondering this myself, will this clematis grow and flower in a woodland setting; how much shade will it take?  I like the bell-shaped clematis too.


Submitted by Lori S. on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 09:26

Very beautiful, James!  

ncole wrote:

That is absolutely gorgeous.  Could I grow this in humid zone 7?  (and how much sun does it need)?

ncole, in what area do you live?  Adding a bit of locale info to one's signature is helpful - others then have some idea where you are located.  It may be that there are other forumists here who could answer your question?   :)

Clematis alpina does very well here but they won't be in bloom until June.  In this area of cool summers, the best bloom is in sun, but they thrive in part sun and even in shade.  
These are just teasers, as the snow is only still melting off today but here are some pretty ones...
C. alpina 'Willy' (with an ex-'Pamela Jackman' seedling twining through); a young 'Constance' planted last year; a different ex-'Pamela Jackman' seedling.
   

We had a massive 'Pamela Jackman' growing in a narrow wooden planter and growing up and over the wire mesh of the cat pen - the vines covered two sides of the 6' tall pen and then went across the top of it (and alpinas actually can get a lot bigger here!)  It was magnificent in bloom, but suddenly up and died one spring!  (Stuart thought perhaps mice had chewed through its roots?)  It did leave a legacy - loads of seedlings with every possible flower variation.  I've dug up and given away dozens of these and still have lots left!


Submitted by ncole on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 09:45

I went to my profile and added Baltimore, Md. and nothing came up


Submitted by Lori S. on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 09:48

ncole, one way of doing it is to add your locale info in the "Signature" area of the Profile.  Then it will show up at the bottom of your messages, as on mine (see below).  (Right now, if someone clicks on your Profile, they can see "Maryland", but it's most helpful to have the info available right on your posts.)

To do this, go to Profile in the menu bar at the top of the screen, then click Modify Profile, then Forum Profile Information.  At this step, you can add some text in the Signature area, if you wish.


Submitted by ncole on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 10:01

Is anything coming up now?


Submitted by Lori S. on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 10:05

Yes, that did it.  Thank you!

(Hey, I've recently come to realize I'm old too!  How'd that happen??  ???)


Submitted by Reed on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 10:12

This Clematis does grow in North Carolina so the humidity should be no problem. I grow this one with morning/mid afternoon sun till about 1:00 and shaded by trees the rest of the day. I do think it would do well in bright spots in the woodland garden since this one is shaded by a wall till it grows above it.


Submitted by Hoy on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 12:13

Clematis alpina is a woodlander! Like many other Clematises they like their roots and lower part of the stem in cool, moist situation but with the top growth and flowers in the sun.

C alpina do very well here in a cool humid climate (- something between 6 and 8!).


Submitted by cohan on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 18:07

I had some alpina seed last year, which did not get sown :-[ I suppose not much hope now? though I will sow it anyway....


Submitted by RickR on Sun, 04/10/2011 - 18:32

I have an ex Pamela Jackson seedling too.  I was going to donate it to our Chapter plant sale, and then it bloomed.  Now I'm not so sure I want to give it away!


Submitted by ncole on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 05:10

Does anyone grow/have 'Lake Baikal'?  I just received one and it is "supposed" to bloom all summer.  Could I expect any blooms this year?  Know hardly anything about Clematis. 


Submitted by Lori S. on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 09:34

C. integrifolia - of which 'Lake Baikal' is said to be a particularly floriferous cultivar - does have a more extended (and later) bloom season here, compared to the spring-blooming alpinas.  (On the other hand, our season is short overall, and very unlike zone 7 Maryland!)
Clematis that are sold commercially here are normally old enough to bloom in the same year. 


Submitted by ncole on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 12:49

Thanks Lori, this is from Plants Delights and is very tiny so I probably will have to wait. 


Submitted by RickR on Thu, 06/09/2011 - 19:27

First bloom, Clematis ochroleuca, from seed.  Yes, the foliage is a bit chlorotic, due to my inattentive care.  It's funny because from the NARGS seed ex, I thought I had received seed of the same species collected in Japan, and it is not at all alike.  When I checked my label (and my 2009 records), this second species was really C. ochotensis.  I am a staunch advocate of meticulous record keeping, and this is why!

         Clematis ochroleuca

           

                                 

         Clematis ochotensis seed collected, Mt. Tokachi, Japan.

             


Submitted by ncole on Fri, 06/10/2011 - 04:47

Well my 'Lake Baikal' died almost immediately.  I am wondering if I should have left it in its' pot for a while longer.


Submitted by Hoy on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 03:14

Rick, you have some very interesting clematis species! I have tried several here but they are hard to grow big as slugs seem to like the young growth very much >:(


Submitted by Lori S. on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 10:42

Interesting species, Rick.

Clematis season is starting here too...
Clematis alpina 'Constance':
 


Submitted by Lori S. on Sun, 06/12/2011 - 20:51

A Clematis alpina seedling, ex. 'Pamela Jackman', in nannyberry (Viburnum lentago); this one is quite like the parent:

Another seedling but single this time -  same parent - in Dasiphora fruticosa (which will probably get drug down and have to be rescued soon):


Submitted by Lori S. on Mon, 06/13/2011 - 21:44

What I grew as C. pierotii has survived (with leaves dusted with pollen)... although, assuming it is what it was claimed to be, apparently the preferred name is C. brevicaudata:

http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200007591

If it survives through time, it will have to fight for dominance of the wayfaring tree it's under with a 'Markham's Pink', which has an advantage of several years growing time.


Submitted by Hoy on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 10:53

I would choose the Clematis for the Dasiphora, Lori!
Although seedlings of alpina and other clematises regularly pop up they seldom grow to flowering age - nice breakfast stuff for slugs and snails.
The brevicaudata leaves didn't look much like the leaves of mature plants. Sure the name is right? (I don't know the species, I looked it up!)


Submitted by Lori S. on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 12:41

Hoy wrote:

I would choose the Clematis for the Dasiphora, Lori!

There are so many Clematis alpina seedlings around here that I don't have to pick one over the other!  I have about a dozen potted up right now to give away!


Submitted by Lori S. on Sat, 06/18/2011 - 21:53

A couple more...
Clematis alpina 'Willy' (with a seedling ex. Pamela Jackman', and by itself) and Clematis 'Markham's Pink' in a wayfaring tree (Viburnum lentago):
   

Here is more of the variation among 'Pamela Jackman' seedlings (demonstrating why only clones, not seeds, can be guaranteed to represent the cultivar):
 

And more variation yet among these self-sown Clematis alpina...
 

Hoy wrote:

The brevicaudata leaves didn't look much like the leaves of mature plants. Sure the name is right? (I don't know the species, I looked it up!)

No, I'm not sure at all - I thought perhaps the differences could be due to immature leaves on my plant (which has just emerged/leafed out), but I don't know.


Submitted by Lori S. on Sun, 06/19/2011 - 18:43

RickR wrote:

When I checked my label (and my 2009 records), this second species was really C. ochotensis.  I am a staunch advocate of meticulous record keeping, and this is why!

Rick, despite what seems like an authentic provenance, I'm wondering if that is really C. ochotensis... ?  The leaves look more like C. alpina... 
I realize that C. ochotensis has been classified as a ssp. of alpina but it seems that the photos of it show 3 more-or-less entire leaves, rather than highly divided ones... ? 


Submitted by RickR on Sun, 06/19/2011 - 23:40

I see what you mean, Lori.  Though I did not find a written description of the foliage, I did find this one pic, out of the soooo many on the web, taken at the University of Helsinki botanic garden: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clematis_ochotensis_Ohotank%C3%A4...

Seed came from the 2008-09 NARGS seed ex #4170 and I have the donor number (121), but that year was the first year I did not get a hard copy of the seed list.  I saved the seed list on my pc, but apparently neglected to keep a copy of the donor list.  And the NARGS website archives does not keep donor lists.  (Why is that?)  So I don't know who 121 is.

At any rate, according to the description given by the donor, the flower is supposed to be "black".  My plant is too young to flower yet, and I suppose if the flower is "black" it could be ochotensis?  (Are there "black" C. alpina?)  Or maybe the flower color was the only  identifying characteristic used when the seed was collected, and therefore not correctly identified?  I don't know.  And I know far less than you would regarding this.


Submitted by Lori S. on Mon, 06/20/2011 - 22:58

RickR wrote:

And I know far less than you would regarding this.

Errr, no, not at all.  I don't know much about clematis -  I was looking up this species the other night for other reasons, and did not see many examples with strongly-divided foliage like your plant, so it is just a guess on my part.  The Wiki entry for this species does look more-or-less like yours, though. 

There does seem to be some dark cultivars of C. alpina and C. macropetala but I don't know about "black". 

Hmm, as I was looking on one of my garden maps for something else, I came across C. ochotensis... I was given a seedling, if I recall correctly.  I'll have to see if it survived and what it looks like...

Any clematis experts out there?


Submitted by Hoy on Tue, 06/21/2011 - 09:57

I am no expert at all but according to C. Grey-Wilson in his book "Clematis the genus" ochotensis "leaves are very similar to alpina but often a more yellow-green". He continues "-with broader sepals 12-24mm as opposed to 10-15mm (in alpina). In addition the staminodes are quite different: in ochotensis they are spatula-shaped up to 20mm long but not more than 3mm wide, whereas in alpina they are pronouncedly spoonshaped not more than 15mm long but about 6mm wide at the widest. The flower colour ranges from bright indigo blue to violet-blue or purple (rarely white) . . "


Submitted by Lori S. on Tue, 06/21/2011 - 20:10

Well, that is excellent news!  Thanks, Trond.  Sorry to cause your clematis a brief identity crisis, Rick!


Submitted by RickR on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 08:57

I missed the last replies on this thread until now...

Thanks Trond for the C. ochotensis description.  It will come in handy when mine blooms.  I have copied it for later use, and I'm becoming more excited as to the prospects!


Submitted by Hoy on Mon, 06/27/2011 - 15:29

RickR wrote:

I missed the last replies on this thread until now...

Thanks Trond for the C. ochotensis description.  It will come in handy when mine blooms.  I have copied it for later use, and I'm becoming more excited as to the prospects!

You are welcome! Hope you will be satisfied when time comes.